Your Daily Best of AI™ News

🚨AI data centers will consume $580 billion this year—$40 billion more than global oil exploration—raising critical questions about whether renewable energy infrastructure can keep pace with the compute arms race.

The Big Idea

Everyone's selling AI shovels. The real gold is in the applications.

The AI infrastructure gold rush is over before most people realized it started.

Foundation models, developer tools, APIs — the entire infrastructure layer is turning into a margin-crushing knife fight between hyperscalers.

OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, Meta, and Amazon are racing to the bottom on price, latency, context windows, and token costs. When the dust settles, margins will be razor-thin.

Meanwhile, the real white space sits one layer up: applications where users actually live, work, and form habits.

Here's the uncomfortable truth: Infrastructure becomes a commodity.

Always has, always will.

The foundation model race looks exciting from the outside. But it's classic infrastructure economics. When commodities compete, differentiation shrinks and pricing power evaporates. Models are becoming utilities — critical, but not where value accrues long-term.

Developer tooling looked like the safe middle ground. But that layer is crowding fast. Every improvement either gets absorbed upstream by foundation models or forked open-source downstream. The middle is getting squeezed.

Why applications are different

Applications are where behavioral moats form. Not just data moats — habit moats.

Users don't live in APIs or eval dashboards. They live in experiences. And experiences compound in ways infrastructure can't replicate.

Context and workflow integration: The best AI apps don't just answer questions — they embed into daily routines. They understand your tools, your data, your team structure. Replicating that requires rebuilding your entire stack, not just swapping an API key.

Proprietary behavioral data: Every edit, action, and intent a user makes in your app creates telemetry that foundation model providers will never see. This feedback loop becomes your training ground — and your competitive advantage.

Domain depth: A legal research app needs legal expertise. A design tool needs design taste. Foundation models are generalists. Applications win by going deep enough that a model alone can't compete.

Distribution and trust: Users choose apps based on brand, reliability, and results — not which model powers the backend. If your app delivers, users won't leave even when a "better" model launches.

The market is catching on

One automation consultant used to charge $5k for a prompt library. Now he charges $50k for a workflow system. Same clients, 10x the value, and they can't get it anywhere else.

AI workflow marketplaces are emerging. Indie makers are packaging their application-layer workflows as products — complete with documentation and support. Some are doing $10k-20k/month selling processes they built for their own businesses.

The philosophical shift: Instead of asking "what's the best model for X?" people are asking "what's the best process for X that includes AI?" The application layer is where that process lives.

What this means

If you're starting an AI company, don't compete on infrastructure. Build applications that solve real problems in specific domains. Go deep enough that a foundation model can't care, and sticky enough that users won't leave even when it can.

If you're choosing where to invest time or capital, look for companies that own the user relationship and the feedback loop. Infrastructure will matter, but it won't be where value accrues.

The infrastructure layer will have winners — security, compliance, low-latency edge computing. But the broader white space is at the application layer, where people, agents, and systems actually interact.

What's next: Expect a wave of vertical AI applications that own specific workflows end-to-end. Healthcare diagnostics, legal research, creative production, sales automation — each will have a dominant app that becomes the interface for AI in that domain. The winners won't be the ones with the best model. They'll be the ones with the stickiest experience.

BTW: The best metric for an AI company isn't which model it uses. It's how often users come back. Infrastructure enables. Applications capture.

How To Build Apps Using AI (No Coding Required)

There is no better time to learn how to use AI to build solutions businesses want. I’m hosting a workshop that will show you, step-by-step, how to build tools and solutions using AI without having to know how to code.

Learn more by clicking below.

Today’s Top Story

OpenAI's hidden Microsoft payments exposed

The Recap: Leaked documents reveal OpenAI paid Microsoft nearly $494 million in revenue share for 2024 and $866 million in just the first three quarters of 2025, exposing a business model where the majority of revenue flows directly back to its primary investor and infrastructure provider.

Unpacked:

  • OpenAI's inference costs exceeded $3.8 billion in 2024 and hit $8.65 billion in the first nine months of 2025—meaning compute expenses are outpacing revenue growth despite billions in topline gains.

  • Microsoft receives roughly 20% of OpenAI's total revenue as part of their partnership agreement, on top of the billions OpenAI pays for Azure infrastructure to run its AI models.

  • The leaked financials show OpenAI generated over $4 billion in 2024 revenue and $4.33 billion through Q3 2025, but the economics reveal razor-thin margins with most revenue cycling back into Microsoft's ecosystem.

Bottom line: These documents pull back the curtain on AI's unit economics problem. Even at multi-billion dollar scale, OpenAI's business model remains structurally dependent on Microsoft's capital and infrastructure, with compute costs consuming most revenue. The question isn't whether AI can generate revenue—it's whether that revenue can ever exceed the astronomical costs of running these models at scale.

Other News

Jeff Bezos becomes co-CEO of AI startup Project Prometheus targeting manufacturing improvements in computing, auto, and aerospace sectors.

Databricks co-founder warns US is losing AI research dominance to China and argues open source is the only strategic counter.

Amazon quietly rebrands satellite network and abandons affordability pitch before launch, signaling strategic pivot in space internet play.

Apple begins serious succession planning as Tim Cook era potentially nears end, marking major leadership transition for tech giant.

Google still harvesting data from downgraded first-gen Nest thermostats despite killing remote control, revealing platform lock-in tactics.

Europe reconsiders 2035 gas car ban as Mercedes CEO's push for weakened rules gains traction amid economic pressures.

Buy Now Pay Later expands rapidly as investor Morris sees warning signs from the other side of the table.

Sakana AI raises $135M at $2.65B valuation in Japan's largest AI fundraise, signaling geopolitical shift in AI development centers.

AI Around The Web
Test Your AI Eye

Can You Spot The AI-Generated Image?

Select "Picture one", "Picture two", "Both", "None"

Login or Subscribe to participate

Prompt Of The Day

Copy and paste this prompt 👇

"Develop a content marketing strategy that aligns with my overall marketing goals and provides a roadmap for creating and distributing high-quality content related to my [service/product]."

Best of AI™ Team

Was this email forwarded to you? Sign up here.

Keep Reading

No posts found