🚨Harmattan AI hits $1.4 billion valuation after raising $200 million led by Rafale fighter jet maker Dassault Aviation, marking the shift from startup disruption to defense prime partnerships—proving that in the AI-powered defense race, contractors are building capabilities in-house rather than waiting for Silicon Valley to deliver.

AI keeps coming up at work, but you still don't get it?

That's exactly why 1M+ professionals working at Google, Meta, and OpenAI read Superhuman AI daily.

Here's what you get:

Join 1M+ pros

Here's the uncomfortable truth about AI that no one in Silicon Valley wants to admit: most people think ChatGPT is a magic wand. Ask it anything, get genius-level results. Just type "make me a business plan" or "write my marketing strategy" and watch the money roll in.

Except that's not how any of this works.

AI is a tool. A powerful, sophisticated, transformative tool—but a tool nonetheless. And like any tool, it has specific capabilities, specific limitations, and requires specific skills to use effectively. Hand a professional-grade camera to someone who doesn't understand exposure, and they'll take worse photos than an iPhone. Give a chainsaw to someone who's never used one, and they'll probably lose a finger.

The same principle applies to AI. But because it talks back to you in perfect sentences, people forget they're operating machinery.

The Illusion of Intelligence

The problem starts with the name: Artificial Intelligence. It sounds magical. It sounds autonomous. It sounds like you can just point it at a problem and let it solve everything while you sip margaritas on a beach somewhere.

This illusion is reinforced every time you see a LinkedIn post about someone who "generated $100K in revenue using ChatGPT" or "built a complete app in 20 minutes with AI." What these posts don't tell you is the hundreds of hours spent learning prompt engineering, the dozens of failed attempts, the manual refinement of every output, and the deep domain expertise required to even know what questions to ask.

ChatGPT didn't write that business plan. You did—ChatGPT was just the word processor.

The AI didn't build that app. A developer did—the AI just typed faster.

It's a Tool, Not a Teammate

When you use Microsoft Word, you don't expect it to write your novel for you. You expect it to format text, check spelling, and save your work. It's a tool that amplifies your ability to write—but you're still doing the writing.

AI is the same thing, just several orders of magnitude more powerful.

Here's what AI actually does:

- Processes patterns in data faster than humans can

- Generates text based on probability distributions

- Recognizes images, translates languages, summarizes information

- Automates repetitive cognitive tasks

- Suggests options based on training data

Here's what AI doesn't do:

- Think strategically about your specific business context

- Understand your customers better than you do

- Replace domain expertise and judgment

- Create original insights from nothing

- Know what "good" looks like without your input

The gap between these two lists is where most people fail with AI. They expect magic. They get machinery.

The Skill Gap Crisis

A 2024 study found that 77% of workers believe AI will make them more productive. But when researchers actually measured outcomes, only 23% showed meaningful productivity gains. The difference? The 23% who succeeded treated AI like a tool that required skill to operate. The others treated it like a genie in a bottle.

This is the dirty secret of the AI revolution: the technology isn't the bottleneck. Human skill is.

You can have access to the most powerful AI models in the world, but if you don't know:

- How to write effective prompts

- When to iterate versus start over

- Which tasks AI actually handles well

- How to verify and refine outputs

- What domain knowledge you need to provide

...then you're just generating expensive garbage at scale.

It's like giving someone a Formula 1 race car when they barely have a driver's license. The tool is incredible. The operator is unprepared. The results are predictable.

How Tools Actually Work

Every tool in human history has required three things to be useful:

1. Understanding its capabilities: You need to know what the tool can and cannot do. A hammer is great for nails, terrible for screws. ChatGPT is great for drafting, summarizing, and brainstorming—terrible for fact-checking, original research, or strategic decision-making.

2. Developing skill in using it: Michelangelo didn't just pick up a chisel and create the David. He spent years learning how to use his tools. AI is no different. The difference between a novice prompt and an expert prompt is night and day—but from the outside, both just look like "typing into ChatGPT."

3. Applying domain expertise: A scalpel in the hands of a surgeon saves lives. In the hands of a toddler, it's a weapon. Your expertise is what transforms AI from a text generator into a productivity multiplier. The AI doesn't know your industry, your customers, or your goals. You do. That knowledge is the difference between useful and useless.

The "Just Use AI" Fallacy

The most dangerous advice in business right now is: "Just use AI for that."

Just use AI to write your marketing copy. (Without understanding marketing, target audiences, or conversion principles.)

Just use AI to code your app. (Without understanding software architecture, user experience, or debugging.)

Just use AI to create your content strategy. (Without understanding your brand voice, audience insights, or business objectives.)

This is like telling someone to "just use Excel" to manage their finances without teaching them what a formula is, how pivot tables work, or what their numbers actually mean. You'll get a spreadsheet full of #REF! errors and wonder why Excel "doesn't work."

The tool works fine. The operator needs training.

What Effective AI Usage Actually Looks Like

When you watch someone who genuinely knows how to use AI, it looks nothing like the "magic" you see on social media. It looks like:

Multiple iterations: The first output is rarely the final output. Experts refine, redirect, and regenerate until the result matches their vision.

Specific constraints: Vague inputs get vague outputs. Effective users provide context, examples, tone guidelines, audience details, and success criteria.

Human judgment: Every AI output gets evaluated against domain expertise. Does this make sense? Is this accurate? Would my customer respond to this? The AI suggests. The human decides.

Tool selection: Different tasks need different tools. ChatGPT for writing. Midjourney for images. Claude for analysis. Perplexity for research. Knowing which tool for which job is half the battle.

Verification: AI is confidently wrong all the time. Experts verify facts, check sources, and validate outputs against reality—because they understand the tool can hallucinate.

This isn't magic. It's craftsmanship.

The Real AI Revolution

Here's what the AI revolution actually looks like: it's not that AI replaces humans. It's not that AI makes everyone equally capable.

The real revolution is that skilled operators with AI tools can do 10x more than skilled operators without them.

But notice what's doing the heavy lifting in that sentence: skilled operators.

A great designer with AI can iterate faster, explore more options, and produce more polished work. A terrible designer with AI just produces terrible work faster.

A strategic marketer with AI can test more copy, analyze more data, and execute more campaigns. A marketer who doesn't understand positioning, messaging, or audience research will just spam bad content at scale.

The tool amplifies the operator. If you're amplifying zero, you still get zero.

What This Means for You

If you're frustrated that AI "isn't working" for you, ask yourself:

- Do I understand what this tool is actually designed to do?

- Have I invested time in learning how to use it effectively?

- Am I providing enough context and constraints?

- Do I have the domain expertise to evaluate its outputs?

- Am I treating this like a tool or like magic?

The companies and individuals winning with AI right now aren't the ones with access to better models. Everyone has access to the same models. They're winning because they've invested in developing the skills to operate those models effectively.

They've learned to write better prompts. They've developed frameworks for iteration. They've built systems for verification. They've integrated AI into their workflows as a tool—not as a replacement for thinking.

What's Next?

The AI skill gap is only going to widen. As models get more powerful, the difference between skilled and unskilled operators will become more dramatic. A novice with GPT-5 will still generate mediocre work. An expert with GPT-5 will generate work that looks like magic—because they've mastered the tool.

The opportunity isn't in having access to AI. Everyone will have that. The opportunity is in developing the skills to use it effectively while everyone else is still waiting for it to work magically.

We're in the earliest days of this technology. In ten years, "prompt engineering" might sound as quaint as "typing class." But right now, in this moment, the people learning to wield AI like a precision instrument are building an unfair advantage over people treating it like a magic 8-ball.

BTW: There's a reason why "AI won't replace you, but someone using AI will" became a cliché. It's not because AI is magic—it's because tools have always worked this way. The person who learns to use the better tool more effectively has always had the advantage. We've just forgotten this lesson because AI talks back to us in complete sentences.

Have an ad concept ready but don't want to deal with expensive shoots or stock footage? ScriptKit lets you generate, curate, and edit AI ads in one platform.

What ScriptKit gives you

Give ScriptKit a shot — go from concept to finished AI ad without wrangling teams or gear.

The Recap: Meta appointed Dina Powell McCormick, former deputy national security adviser to President Trump and longtime Goldman Sachs executive, as its first-ever president and vice chairman, creating a newly invented C-suite role focused on capital partnerships and regulatory relationships. Zuckerberg said her "experience at the highest levels of global finance, combined with her deep relationships around the world" makes her suited to help Meta manage its next phase of growth, while Meta committed as much as $72 billion in 2025 capital spending to stay competitive in AI. This marks the second former Trump administration member Meta has hired in recent weeks, signaling that political access matters more than product innovation in the AI infrastructure era.

Unpacked:

Bottom line: Meta's creation of a president role for a former Trump advisor isn't a personnel decision—it's a strategic admission that winning AI requires political capital as much as technical talent. As Meta accelerates investments in frontier AI and personal superintelligence, the company has concluded that access to financing, regulatory approval, and government partnerships will determine who survives the infrastructure arms race. Powell McCormick's hire signals that Silicon Valley's "move fast and break things" era is over, replaced by "move deliberately and secure regulatory approval."

Harmattan AI raises $200M at $1.4B valuation from Rafale maker Dassault Aviation just 18 months after founding, proving defense contractors are acquiring AI capabilities through equity rather than procurement as software eats warfare faster than governments can write contracts.

Google launches Universal Commerce Protocol co-developed with Shopify, Walmart, and Target to let AI assistants handle checkout directly in conversational flows—turning every AI surface into a transaction layer before competitors can lock in the commerce middleware stack.

SpaceX receives FCC approval for 7,500 additional Starlink Gen2 satellites bringing the total authorized fleet to 15,000, locking in orbital infrastructure dominance that will power AI compute distribution and low-latency global connectivity for decades.

Apple confirms Google's Gemini will power upgraded Siri launching later this year in a multi-year partnership worth roughly $1 billion annually, admitting that proprietary foundation models failed to deliver differentiation and that buying beats building when you're this far behind.

Nuclear startups attract renewed investor interest with small modular reactors targeting AI data center power needs, creating an infrastructure asymmetry where companies securing dedicated energy sources will outcompute rivals constrained by grid capacity.

OpenAI reportedly asks contractors to upload actual work files from previous jobs for training data, raising IP liability questions that could reshape how AI companies acquire proprietary knowledge and defend against copyright claims.

Indonesia and Malaysia block Grok over non-consensual sexualized deepfakes, demonstrating how governments use AI safety as regulatory pretext to fragment the global AI landscape into regional competitors with localized platforms.

Motional targets 2026 for driverless robotaxi service by putting AI at the center of its reboot, signaling companies will deploy imperfect autonomous systems at scale to capture first-mover advantages despite unresolved technical barriers.

Ireland fast-tracks legislation criminalizing harmful AI-generated voice and image misuse, demonstrating European democracies are moving faster than the US on AI regulation and creating competitive advantages for companies already aligned with stricter standards.

Best of AI™ Team

Was this email forwarded to you? Sign up here.